<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schedule Software &#187; Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schedulesoftware.com/tag/code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schedulesoftware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This year&#8217;s tax code: A lot like last year, with a few sweeteners</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/this-years-tax-code-a-lot-like-last-year-with-a-few-sweeteners/716/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/this-years-tax-code-a-lot-like-last-year-with-a-few-sweeteners/716/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[schedule software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/this-years-tax-code-a-lot-like-last-year-with-a-few-sweeteners/716/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year&#8217;s tax code: A lot like last year, with a few sweeteners
Late action by Congress means taxpayers who itemize must wait for IRS to update systems.
Read more on The Post-Standard
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This year&#8217;s tax code: A lot like last year, with a few sweeteners</b><br />
Late action by Congress means taxpayers who itemize must wait for IRS to update systems.</p>
<p>Read more on <a href="http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/02/this_years_tax_code_a_lot_like.html">The Post-Standard</a><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/this-years-tax-code-a-lot-like-last-year-with-a-few-sweeteners/716/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better government through code &#8211; Code for America founder Jennifer Pahlka wants to empower developers to become civic &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/better-government-through-code-code-for-america-founder-jennifer-pahlka-wants-to-empower-developers-to-become-civic/453/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/better-government-through-code-code-for-america-founder-jennifer-pahlka-wants-to-empower-developers-to-become-civic/453/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[schedule making software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Become]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pahlka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Through]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/better-government-through-code-code-for-america-founder-jennifer-pahlka-wants-to-empower-developers-to-become-civic/453/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better government through code &#8211; Code for America founder Jennifer Pahlka wants to empower developers to become civic &#8230;
The new non-profit Code for America teams cities and developers to create civic-minded web and mobile applications. Founder Jennifer Pahlka, who extended the innovative volunteerism of Teach for America toward software developers with this new organization, discusses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Better government through code &#8211; Code for America founder Jennifer Pahlka wants to empower developers to become civic &#8230;</b><br />
The new non-profit Code for America teams cities and developers to create civic-minded web and mobile applications. Founder Jennifer Pahlka, who extended the innovative volunteerism of Teach for America toward software developers with this new organization, discusses Code for America and its mission in the following interview.</p>
<p>Read more on <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/05/code-for-america-empowering-so.html">O&#8217;Reilly Media</a><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/better-government-through-code-code-for-america-founder-jennifer-pahlka-wants-to-empower-developers-to-become-civic/453/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is going on with tax refunds this year? Code 9001, Schedule M or no, NO REFUND&#8230; headache!?</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/what-is-going-on-with-tax-refunds-this-year-code-9001-schedule-m-or-no-no-refund-headache/305/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/what-is-going-on-with-tax-refunds-this-year-code-9001-schedule-m-or-no-no-refund-headache/305/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[schedule making software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[going]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/what-is-going-on-with-tax-refunds-this-year-code-9001-schedule-m-or-no-no-refund-headache/305/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My sister and I both filed on January 15th using TaxACT online software. On the 18th, we both received acknowledgement that our returns had been accepted by the IRS. We both expected that we would have our refunds by January 29th. Obviously this did not happen. On January 21th, my status would not pull up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister and I both filed on January 15th using TaxACT online software. On the 18th, we both received acknowledgement that our returns had been accepted by the IRS. We both expected that we would have our refunds by January 29th. Obviously this did not happen. On January 21th, my status would not pull up on WMR. My sisters, however, said: &#8220;We are sorry, we cannot provide any information about your refund. For more information, please continue. Please mention reference number 9001 to the IRS Customer Service Representative.&#8221;. So we consulted the forums and noticed that many other people had the same issues. We were convinced that the IRS was probably backed up and experiencing delays, etc&#8230; January 29th comes and guess what&#8230; neither of us has a refund. So naturally we consult, WMR. My status reads &#8220;We are sorry, we cannot provide any information about your refund. For more information, please continue. Please mention reference number 9001 to the IRS Customer Service Representative.&#8221; and my sisters reads &#8220;We have received your tax return and it is being processed. Unless we find mistakes or you owe other taxes, you should receive your refund by February 9, 2010.&#8221; Also note that we both had &#8220;Schedule M&#8221; filed which is some making work pay credit that TurboTAX filed for us without even asking. I don&#8217;t even know what the heck that is so neither of us claimed it on our taxes last year.  Anyway&#8230; Today I decided to call the IRS to see what the heck is going on with my refund. Here is a condensed and lightly paraphrased version of the conversation below. This call is in reference to my refund which currently has the 9001 status as my sisters WMR gave her a tentative date of February 9, 2010.  </p>
<p>Transcript:</p>
<p>(Asks verification questions &#8211; filing status, ssn, address, exemptions). We received your return on the 18th. One moment while I research your account further. (One minute later&#8230;) What code are you receiving on the wheres my refund?  (ref # 9001). Ok let me see what that code means. (holds for 1-2 minutes). Well, it looks like they&#8217;ve sent you a 4464c letter on the 21st. They are holding your refund for a review. It might take a while, but I&#8217;m not 100% sure how long it might take. If we send you another letter, just respond to it and things should progress accordingly. As of now (2/1/10) no additional letters have been sent. Thanks for calling. </p>
<p>Conclusions:</p>
<p>We are both still without refunds, had to cancel major plans, and have decided to change our witholdings status (so PLEASE, no suggestions about that). If you have some knowledgable insight or you&#8217;re going through the same thing, we&#8217;d love to hear from ya. For those of you in the same boat, I&#8217;ll keep you updated as well. I think some tax laws may have taken into effect that make it more difficult to get refunds this year, but I&#8217;m not sure. Any ideas are welcomed as we&#8217;re both LOST. God bless! <img src='http://schedulesoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Trying to smile in the face of not being able to pay the rent which was due today&#8230; what a bummer.<br />
1. I did not receive the EIC. I don&#8217;t have any dependants. </p>
<p>2. I&#8217;ve only checked the site 3 times sense January 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/what-is-going-on-with-tax-refunds-this-year-code-9001-schedule-m-or-no-no-refund-headache/305/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custom Software Development: Why Old Code Isn’t Bad Code</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/custom-software-development-why-old-code-isn%e2%80%99t-bad-code/61/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/custom-software-development-why-old-code-isn%e2%80%99t-bad-code/61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software development schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isn’t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/custom-software-development-why-old-code-isn%e2%80%99t-bad-code/61/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If youâve managed software developers long enough youâve heard this phrase: âThat code is old, we should replace it.â In fact, Iâm sure youâve heard it more times than you can count: if you had a nickelâ¦ well you get the idea. Is old code bad? Should it be replaced? Where does the prejudice come [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If youâve managed software developers long enough youâve heard this phrase: âThat code is old, we should replace it.â In fact, Iâm sure youâve heard it more times than you can count: if you had a nickelâ¦ well you get the idea. Is old code bad? Should it be replaced? Where does the prejudice come from that makes developers believe that any code older than their latest cell phone needs to be replaced?</p>
<p>Â Most developers believe that their code is better than everyone elseâs. This is not altogether bad. A good manager wants developers that are sure of themselves. We ask them to solve very difficult problems, in a foreign language, using a mix of theory and creativity that only a small percentage of the population can understand. The benefit to this confidence is that the majority of the time they solve the problem. The detriment to this confidence is that it usually takes them longer than they expect. Thereâs a good reason that project plans arenât based on developer estimates because theyâre usually wrong.</p>
<p>Â Of course there is more to it than that. GoodÂ custom software development is HARD. Anyone can write some code that calculates sales tax for a couple transactions. It takes a special group to write a similar application that works across the world and can perform calculations 500,000 times a minute. The kind of developers that can do that are rare and their code will stand the test of time. At Amadeus Consulting, those developers are called Architects because they do more than just develop software, they âarchitectâ platforms.</p>
<p>Â AÂ software development platform is an attempt to provide the best of both worlds. At the core a platform provides a set of functionality written to scale and be expanded. The principle here is that once the main functions have been created, tested and proven in the field you should not have to deal with them again. However, every client is different and will put their spin on a project. This is where the creativity and ability of developers should be applied. Having an expandable platform allows developers to customize in order to meet the clientâs needs without jeopardizing the core business functionality. The sales tax example is a good one. Once you nail that you shouldnât write it again. How much money will it cost your company if the next developer comes along and makes an error? You could be left with a big tax bill at the end of the year for no other reason than that developer was sure their way was a better way. We have developed platforms over the years that support application development solutions including e-commerce, content management (CMS), client relationship management (CRM) and business intelligence. These platforms were architected and continue to stand the test of time.</p>
<p>Â As a Director I have to be pragmatic about code. Sometimes we should write it from scratch, sometimes we should use a third-party tool and most of the time we should use our own platform. When it comes tocustom application development, meshing business need, budget, scope and schedule with the best tools available is why our customers have come to rely on us and why they come back time after time. Is old code bad code? Old code is just old, but poorly written code will always be a problem. Iâd rather base my business on old code that was well architected than the latest thing that was poorly written.</p>
<div style="margin:5px;padding:5px;border:1px solid #c1c1c1;font-size: 10px;">
<div class="text">
<p>Amadeus Consulting is a custom software development company dedicated to creating intelligent technology solutions. As a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner, we have competencies in Custom Development, Mobility and Data Management. Other areas of expertise include content management, e-commerce, social networking, data collection and management, browser plug-ins, and iPhone application development.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article_exit_link');" href="http://www.amadeusconsulting.com" target="_blank">www.amadeusconsulting.com</a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/custom-software-development-why-old-code-isn%e2%80%99t-bad-code/61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

