<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schedule Software &#187; method</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schedulesoftware.com/tag/method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schedulesoftware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Would you have used this method, which seems to have been industry-standard, to set to work Collins Class?</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/would-you-have-used-this-method-which-seems-to-have-been-industry-standard-to-set-to-work-collins-class/480/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/would-you-have-used-this-method-which-seems-to-have-been-industry-standard-to-set-to-work-collins-class/480/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[schedule management software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrystandard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[would]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/would-you-have-used-this-method-which-seems-to-have-been-industry-standard-to-set-to-work-collins-class/480/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[submarine computerization software ?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>submarine computerization software ?</p>
<p><<A Maturity Model for Automated Software Testing<br />
Mitchel H. Krause<br />
Aside from their mandate to provide a safe and reliable product, manufacturers of computerized medical devices may have three very practical reasons for automating their software testing program: their product is too complicated to test manually, the time devoted to manual testing is cutting into potential profits, and current FDA requirements will be easier to satisfy with automated testing and documentation. If any of these factors motivates your company, this article will help you to sort out the issues to be considered and options available. Then, when the automated test program is in place, safer and more reliable products will follow.1 The sorting instrument presented is a maturity model that plots four levels of testing maturity in terms of the resources required to move from one level to the next. The model can be used to determine the level that best fits your company and its products.<br />
THE SOFTWARE TESTING MATURITY MODEL<br />
The software testing maturity model, shown in Figure 1, is similar to a software process maturity model that is familiar to many software engineers. It has been described by Watts S. Humphrey in his book Managing the Software Process,2 and has been cited by Frank Houston, a former FDA staffer, and Steven Rakitin in presentations to the Health Industry Manufacturers Association.3,4 The version shown here as Figure 2 is adapted from Rakitin's presentation. The process model adapts well to automated software testing because effective software verification and validation programs grow out of development programs that are well planned, executed, managed, and monitored. A good software test program cannot stand alone; it must be an integral part of the software development process.<br />
Level 1: Accidental Automation. The first level of the software testing model--like level 1 in the software process model-- is characterized by ad hoc, individualistic, chaotic attempts to get the job done. Important information (for example, what to test) is not documented and must be extracted from in-house experts. Test plans are sketchy. Test results are not documented consistently. Schedules slip. Either products are delayed or testing becomes a cursory, poorly documented exercise. Management is uninvolved or uninformed.<br />
This level has been designated Accidental Automation because the use of any automated tools or techniques comes about almost as if by accident and is not supported by process, planning, or management functions. Products released on the basis of such testing may well be accidents waiting to happen. Testing at this level may be appropriate only for a product that has no potential for harming the patient or user; it is never appropriate for a computerized medical device.<br />
Level 2: Beginning Automation. The second testing level corresponds directly to Level 2¬Repeatable in the software process maturity model (see Figure 2). There are hundreds of capture-and-replay test tools on the market today that simply repeat the responses of a system under test.5 As in the process model, however, these tools have limited capabilities and lose their economic usefulness quickly as a product changes.<br />
Level 2 testing is still dependent on information locked in the minds of in-house experts, although documentation is beginning to appear in the form of software requirements specifications (SRSs) and test requirements specifications (TRSs). However, in most cases, large portions of these documents are written after the fact and used to meet regulatory requirements rather than to direct the development and test processes. Writing them does, however, provide good practice for moving to level 3.<br />
Level 3: Intentional Automation. At the third level, automated testing becomes both well defined and well managed. The TRSs and the test scripts themselves proceed logically from the SRSs and design documents. Furthermore, because the test team is now part of the development process, these documents are written before the product is delivered for testing. Consequently, schedules become more reliable. Level 3 is appropriate for many medical device manufacturers.<br />
Level 4: Advanced Automation. The highest testing maturity level is a practiced and perfected version of level 3 with one major addition: postrelease defect tracking. Defects are trapped and sent directly back through the fix, test creation, and regression test processes. The software test team is now an integral part of product development, and testers and developers work together to build a product that will meet test requirements. Any software bugs that do occur are caught early, when they are much less expensive to fix.<br />
When testing is performed at this level, an FDA inspector can pick up any piece of product documentation and trace the development process all the way from the SRS that describes the feature to the test results that validate it.>></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/would-you-have-used-this-method-which-seems-to-have-been-industry-standard-to-set-to-work-collins-class/480/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effective methods for managing the problems with current scheduling method</title>
		<link>http://schedulesoftware.com/effective-methods-for-managing-the-problems-with-current-scheduling-method/158/</link>
		<comments>http://schedulesoftware.com/effective-methods-for-managing-the-problems-with-current-scheduling-method/158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[schedule making software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scheduling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schedulesoftware.com/effective-methods-for-managing-the-problems-with-current-scheduling-method/158/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the problems with current scheduling method?
If you are using paper or excel then you are almost bound to be having problems with current scheduling method. Using excel can take hours while if you are using paper it can almost double the time. This is a task the few employers enjoy and it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the problems with current scheduling method?</p>
<p>If you are using paper or excel then you are almost bound to be having problems with current scheduling method. Using excel can take hours while if you are using paper it can almost double the time. This is a task the few employers enjoy and it is one they are only too happy to pass on to somebody else when they can. There are however a few ways of dealing with problems with your current scheduling method that will at least make thing a bit easier. The normal reasons for issues arising include the following; the wrong person is responsible for scheduling, you don&#8217;t have effective policies for shift changes, or you aren&#8217;t making use of available technology. We will look at each of these below.</p>
<p>Problems with scheduling method and the human factor</p>
<p>One of the main causes for problems with schedules is having the wrong person doing the job. This is not something that anyone can do; it involves a lot of skill and knowledge. The person in charge of scheduling should know the business inside-out and understand the demands for each shift; they should also understand computers if they are going to be using excel. This person will also need to fully understand the skill mix that will be required for each work period and be able to match this with the available staff. This person will need to be able to handle constant change and be competent enough to alter the schedule while managing the knock on effects of any change. One of the main causes of problems with scheduling method is that people make changes without making the necessary alterations elsewhere on the schedule; for example they move employee A&#8217;s shift to cover an absent employee B but forget to replace employee A in the shift they were moved from. </p>
<p>Problems with scheduling method and business policies</p>
<p>Another cause of problems is not having correct policies in regards to booking holidays and sick leave. If the person responsible for schedules does not have enough notice then it will be practically impossible to manage changes effectively. It should be company policy that except in dire emergencies that people should give at least a month&#8217;s notice for any holiday requests. It should also be policy that staff try and give at least 8 hours notice before going off sick. </p>
<p>Problems with scheduling method and new technologies</p>
<p>If you are still using paper schedules then you really aren&#8217;t doing yourself any favours; unless you only have a handful of staff on a more or less constant schedule. Making changes to a paper schedule can make things messy, and you might end up wasting many hours rewriting schedules. It is also easier to make mistakes with this old fashioned method. If you are using excel then this will be a bit easier, but it will still take a bit of time to make changes. Nowadays there are online scheduling options that are probably the easiest and most cost effective way of dealing with the problem.</p>
<div style="margin:5px;padding:5px;border:1px solid #c1c1c1;font-size: 10px;">
<div class="text">
<p>Ryan Fyfe is the owner of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article_exit_link');" href="http://www.shiftplanning.com/">http://www.shiftplanning.com/</a> &#8211; an information resource for all things related to <a rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article_exit_link');" href="http://www.shiftplanning.com/">Schedule Management</a> including articles, news, movies and more.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schedulesoftware.com/effective-methods-for-managing-the-problems-with-current-scheduling-method/158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

